Show filters
24 Total Results
Displaying 11-20 of 24
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-45105

Disclosure Date: December 18, 2021 (last updated February 23, 2025)
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-34429

Disclosure Date: July 15, 2021 (last updated February 23, 2025)
For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-3450

Disclosure Date: March 25, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verific…
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-25252

Disclosure Date: March 03, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Trend Micro's Virus Scan API (VSAPI) and Advanced Threat Scan Engine (ATSE) - are vulnerable to a memory exhaustion vulnerability that may lead to denial-of-service or system freeze if exploited by an attacker using a specially crafted file.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2020-3164

Disclosure Date: March 05, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA), Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA), and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance (SMA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause high CPU usage on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of specific HTTP request headers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malformed HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to trigger a prolonged status of high CPU utilization relative to the GUI process(es). Upon successful exploitation of this vulnerability, an affected device will still be operative, but its response time and overall performance may be degraded.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2020-3154

Disclosure Date: February 20, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Cloud Web Security (CWS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL queries. The vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface improperly validates SQL values. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability sending malicious requests to the affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to modify values on or return values from the underlying database.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-13163

Disclosure Date: February 07, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
The Fujitsu TLS library allows a man-in-the-middle attack. This affects Interstage Application Development Cycle Manager V10 and other versions, Interstage Application Server V12 and other versions, Interstage Business Application Manager V2 and other versions, Interstage Information Integrator V11 and other versions, Interstage Job Workload Server V8, Interstage List Works V10 and other versions, Interstage Studio V12 and other versions, Interstage Web Server Express V11, Linkexpress V5, Safeauthor V3, ServerView Resource Orchestrator V3, Systemwalker Cloud Business Service Management V1, Systemwalker Desktop Keeper V15, Systemwalker Desktop Patrol V15, Systemwalker IT Change Manager V14, Systemwalker Operation Manager V16 and other versions, Systemwalker Runbook Automation V15 and other versions, Systemwalker Security Control V1, and Systemwalker Software Configuration Manager V15.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-1559

Disclosure Date: February 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-3639

Disclosure Date: May 22, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2015-0689

Disclosure Date: September 19, 2017 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Cisco Cloud Web Security before 3.0.1.7 allows remote attackers to bypass intended filtering protection mechanisms by leveraging improper handling of HTTP methods, aka Bug ID CSCut69743.
0