Show filters
50 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 50
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Moderate
OpenSSL TLS Server Crash (NULL pointer dereference) — CVE-2021-3449
Disclosure Date: March 25, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
4
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-1971
Disclosure Date: December 08, 2020 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious c…
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2017-5753
Disclosure Date: January 04, 2018 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-4106
Disclosure Date: June 26, 2024 (last updated June 26, 2024)
A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS and CI Server. The affected products have built-in accounts with no passwords set. Therefore, if the product is operated without a password set by default, an attacker can break into the affected product.
The affected products and versions are as follows:
FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04
CI Server R1.01.00 to R1.03.00
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-4105
Disclosure Date: June 26, 2024 (last updated June 26, 2024)
A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS and CI Server. The affected product's WEB HMI server's function to process HTTP requests has a security flaw (Reflected XSS) that allows the execution of malicious scripts. Therefore, if a client PC with inadequate security measures accesses a product URL containing a malicious request, the malicious script may be executed on the client PC.
The affected products and versions are as follows:
FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04
CI Server R1.01.00 to R1.03.00
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-37967
Disclosure Date: November 09, 2022 (last updated January 11, 2025)
Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-38023
Disclosure Date: November 09, 2022 (last updated January 11, 2025)
Netlogon RPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-37966
Disclosure Date: November 09, 2022 (last updated January 11, 2025)
Windows Kerberos RC4-HMAC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-2048
Disclosure Date: July 07, 2022 (last updated October 07, 2023)
In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up not properly cleaning up the active connections and associated resources. This can lead to a Denial of Service scenario where there are no enough resources left to process good requests.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-2047
Disclosure Date: July 07, 2022 (last updated October 07, 2023)
In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 thru 9.4.46, and 10.0.0 thru 10.0.9, and 11.0.0 thru 11.0.9 versions, the parsing of the authority segment of an http scheme URI, the Jetty HttpURI class improperly detects an invalid input as a hostname. This can lead to failures in a Proxy scenario.
0