Show filters
200 Total Results
Displaying 31-40 of 200
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-2336

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
Softing Secure Integration Server, edgeConnector, and edgeAggregator software ships with the default administrator credentials as `admin` and password as `admin`. This allows Softing to log in to the server directly to perform administrative functions. Upon installation or upon first login, the application does not ask the user to change the `admin` password. There is no warning or prompt to ask the user to change the default password, and to change the password, many steps are required.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-2335

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
A crafted HTTP packet with a -1 content-length header can create a denial-of-service condition in Softing Secure Integration Server V1.22.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-2334

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
The application searches for a library dll that is not found. If an attacker can place a dll with this name, then the attacker can leverage it to execute arbitrary code on the targeted Softing Secure Integration Server V1.22.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-1748

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
Softing OPC UA C++ Server SDK, Secure Integration Server, edgeConnector, edgeAggregator, OPC Suite, and uaGate are affected by a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-1373

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
The “restore configuration” feature of Softing Secure Integration Server V1.22 is vulnerable to a directory traversal vulnerability when processing zip files. An attacker can craft a zip file to load an arbitrary dll and execute code. Using the "restore configuration" feature to upload a zip file containing a path traversal file may cause a file to be created and executed upon touching the disk.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-1069

Disclosure Date: August 17, 2022 (last updated October 08, 2023)
A crafted HTTP packet with a large content-length header can create a denial-of-service condition in Softing Secure Integration Server V1.22.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2022-27239

Disclosure Date: April 27, 2022 (last updated October 07, 2023)
In cifs-utils through 6.14, a stack-based buffer overflow when parsing the mount.cifs ip= command-line argument could lead to local attackers gaining root privileges.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-3712

Disclosure Date: August 24, 2021 (last updated February 23, 2025)
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL termi…
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-3711

Disclosure Date: August 24, 2021 (last updated February 23, 2025)
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data …
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2015-6815

Disclosure Date: January 31, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
The process_tx_desc function in hw/net/e1000.c in QEMU before 2.4.0.1 does not properly process transmit descriptor data when sending a network packet, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and guest crash) via unspecified vectors.