Show filters
227 Total Results
Displaying 221-227 of 227
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-3878
Disclosure Date: February 27, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.5 and iPadOS 13.5, macOS Catalina 10.15.5, tvOS 13.4.5, watchOS 6.2.5, iTunes 12.10.7 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 11.2, iCloud for Windows 7.19. Processing a maliciously crafted image may lead to arbitrary code execution.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-3838
Disclosure Date: February 27, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
The issue was addressed with improved permissions logic. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.3.1 and iPadOS 13.3.1, macOS Catalina 10.15.3, tvOS 13.3.1, watchOS 6.1.2. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with system privileges.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-20044
Disclosure Date: February 24, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In Zsh before 5.8, attackers able to execute commands can regain privileges dropped by the --no-PRIVILEGED option. Zsh fails to overwrite the saved uid, so the original privileges can be restored by executing MODULE_PATH=/dir/with/module zmodload with a module that calls setuid().
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-19906
Disclosure Date: December 19, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
cyrus-sasl (aka Cyrus SASL) 2.1.27 has an out-of-bounds write leading to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service in OpenLDAP via a malformed LDAP packet. The OpenLDAP crash is ultimately caused by an off-by-one error in _sasl_add_string in common.c in cyrus-sasl.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-15165
Disclosure Date: October 03, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
sf-pcapng.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 does not properly validate the PHB header length before allocating memory.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-13057
Disclosure Date: July 26, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-13565
Disclosure Date: July 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user.
0