High
CVE-2023-4911
CVE-2023-4911
Description
A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library’s dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.
Add Assessment
Technical Analysis
This is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the dynamic loader of glibc. GLIBC_TUNABLES is an environment variable which contains a colon separated set of switches that allow the user to tweak how glibc runs without having to recompile the binary. Example of how to properly set the environment variable:
GLIBC_TUNABLES=tunable1=AAA:tunable2=BBB
When the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable is parsed in vulnerable versions, we can cause a buffer overflow by setting:
GLIBC_TUNABLES=tunable1=tunable2=AAA
Taking a look at glibc source code we can see why this works; the key is the absence of the colon in the above example and how that is handled at lines 203-204:
// (GLIBC ld.so sources in ./glibc-2.37/elf/dl-tunables.c) 162 static void 163 parse_tunables (char *tunestr, char *valstring) 164 { ... 168 char *p = tunestr; 169 size_t off = 0; 170 171 while (true) 172 { 173 char *name = p; 174 size_t len = 0; 175 176 /* First, find where the name ends. */ 177 while (p[len] != '=' && p[len] != ':' && p[len] != '\0') 178 len++; 179 180 /* If we reach the end of the string before getting a valid name-value 181 pair, bail out. */ 182 if (p[len] == '\0') 183 { 184 if (__libc_enable_secure) 185 tunestr[off] = '\0'; 186 return; 187 } 188 189 /* We did not find a valid name-value pair before encountering the 190 colon. */ 191 if (p[len]== ':') 192 { 193 p += len + 1; 194 continue; 195 } 196 197 p += len + 1; 198 199 /* Take the value from the valstring since we need to NULL terminate it. */ 200 char *value = &valstring[p - tunestr]; 201 len = 0; 202 203 while (p[len] != ':' && p[len] != '\0') 204 len++; 205 206 /* Add the tunable if it exists. */ 207 for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof (tunable_list) / sizeof (tunable_t); i++) 208 { 209 tunable_t *cur = &tunable_list[i]; 210 211 if (tunable_is_name (cur->name, name)) 212 { ... 219 if (__libc_enable_secure) 220 { 221 if (cur->security_level != TUNABLE_SECLEVEL_SXID_ERASE) 222 { 223 if (off > 0) 224 tunestr[off++] = ':'; 225 226 const char *n = cur->name; 227 228 while (*n != '\0') 229 tunestr[off++] = *n++; 230 231 tunestr[off++] = '='; 232 233 for (size_t j = 0; j < len; j++) 234 tunestr[off++] = value[j]; 235 } 236 237 if (cur->security_level != TUNABLE_SECLEVEL_NONE) 238 break; 239 } 240 241 value[len] = '\0'; 242 tunable_initialize (cur, value); 243 break; 244 } 245 } 246 247 if (p[len] != '\0') 248 p += len + 1; 249 } 250 }
In the initial loop of “while (true)” within parse_tunables() (at lines 221-235), the entire “tunable1=tunable2=AAA” gets copied directly into tunestr, effectively filling it up. Moving to lines 247-248, p remains unchanged (as p[len] is ‘\0’ due to the absence of ‘:’ at lines 203-204), hence still referencing the value of “tunable1,” specifically “tunable2=AAA.” As the second loop of “while (true)” in parse_tunables() executes, “tunable2=AAA” gets added (as if it were another parameter) to tunestr, which is already at maximum capacity, resulting in a tunestr overflow. This can be used to invoke a SUID binary which will then, if we’re lucky, invoke the shell code we’ve overflowed onto the stack.
Attacker Value & Exploitability
There were a wide range of linux distributions that shipped with the affected glibc library. However to exploit each distribution you need to determine a specific “magic” offset in order for the buffer overflow to result in RCE. The original PoC shipped with tooling for users to determine this magic offset when ASLR was disabled, however it wasn’t working for Fedora, RedHat, Amazon Linux, Gentoo and a couple others I tested. Due to the low level complexity of the vuln the PoC likely needed some massaging in order to exploit those distros.
Because ASLR is enabled by default, you need to loop over the exploit many times in order for it to be successful. You have approximately a 1/2700 chance of the exploit being successful every time you attempt to exploit it. You can easily loop over exploit attempts quickly so that part doesn’t affect exploitability too much though does add a significant wait time for the exploit to be successful.
By default Ubuntu patches this vuln automatically as a part of the Automatic Security Updates, so you do have to go out of your way to set up a vulnerable instance.
CVSS V3 Severity and Metrics
General Information
Vendors
- fedoraproject,
- gnu,
- redhat
Products
- codeready linux builder eus 8.6,
- codeready linux builder for arm64 eus 8.6,
- codeready linux builder for ibm z systems eus 8.6,
- codeready linux builder for power little endian eus 8.6,
- enterprise linux 8.0,
- enterprise linux 9.0,
- enterprise linux eus 8.6,
- enterprise linux for arm 64 eus 8.6 aarch64,
- enterprise linux for ibm z systems eus s390x 8.6,
- enterprise linux for power big endian eus 8.6 ppc64le,
- enterprise linux server aus 8.6,
- enterprise linux server tus 8.6,
- fedora 37,
- fedora 38,
- fedora 39,
- glibc,
- virtualization 4.0,
- virtualization host 4.0
Metasploit Modules
Exploited in the Wild
References
Exploit
Additional sources will be added here as they become relevant.
Notes: We will only add the top 3 POCs for a given CVE. POCs added here must have at least 2 GitHub stars.
Miscellaneous
