Show filters
8 Total Results
Displaying 1-8 of 8
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2017-12617

Disclosure Date: October 04, 2017 (last updated July 17, 2024)
When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-45105

Disclosure Date: December 18, 2021 (last updated October 07, 2023)
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2020-1945

Disclosure Date: May 14, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Apache Ant 1.1 to 1.9.14 and 1.10.0 to 1.10.7 uses the default temporary directory identified by the Java system property java.io.tmpdir for several tasks and may thus leak sensitive information. The fixcrlf and replaceregexp tasks also copy files from the temporary directory back into the build tree allowing an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-10219

Disclosure Date: November 08, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-2737

Disclosure Date: April 19, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Returns Management component of Oracle Retail Applications (subcomponent: Security). Supported versions that are affected are 2.3.8, 2.4.9, 14.0.4 and 14.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Retail Returns Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Retail Returns Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Retail Returns Management accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1270

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1271

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1272

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, provide client-side support for multipart requests. When Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux server application (server A) receives input from a remote client, and then uses that input to make a multipart request to another server (server B), it can be exposed to an attack, where an extra multipart is inserted in the content of the request from server A, causing server B to use the wrong value for a part it expects. This could to lead privilege escalation, for example, if the part content represents a username or user roles.