Show filters
16 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 16
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-40528

Disclosure Date: September 06, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-33560

Disclosure Date: June 08, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-3345

Disclosure Date: January 29, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
_gcry_md_block_write in cipher/hash-common.c in Libgcrypt version 1.9.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow when the digest final function sets a large count value. It is recommended to upgrade to 1.9.1 or later.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2014-3591

Disclosure Date: November 29, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
Libgcrypt before 1.6.3 and GnuPG before 1.4.19 does not implement ciphertext blinding for Elgamal decryption, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using crafted ciphertext and the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field during multiplication.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2015-0837

Disclosure Date: November 29, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
The mpi_powm function in Libgcrypt before 1.6.3 and GnuPG before 1.4.19 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging timing differences when accessing a pre-computed table during modular exponentiation, related to a "Last-Level Cache Side-Channel Attack."
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-13627

Disclosure Date: September 25, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
It was discovered that there was a ECDSA timing attack in the libgcrypt20 cryptographic library. Version affected: 1.8.4-5, 1.7.6-2+deb9u3, and 1.6.3-2+deb8u4. Versions fixed: 1.8.5-2 and 1.6.3-2+deb8u7.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-12904

Disclosure Date: June 20, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
In Libgcrypt 1.8.4, the C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.) NOTE: the vendor's position is that the issue report cannot be validated because there is no description of an attack
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2017-7526

Disclosure Date: July 26, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
libgcrypt before version 1.7.8 is vulnerable to a cache side-channel attack resulting into a complete break of RSA-1024 while using the left-to-right method for computing the sliding-window expansion. The same attack is believed to work on RSA-2048 with moderately more computation. This side-channel requires that attacker can run arbitrary software on the hardware where the private RSA key is used.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-0495

Disclosure Date: June 13, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Libgcrypt before 1.7.10 and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures that can be mitigated through the use of blinding during the signing process in the _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign function in cipher/ecc-ecdsa.c, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-6829

Disclosure Date: February 07, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation.
0