Show filters
31 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 31
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Moderate
OpenSSL TLS Server Crash (NULL pointer dereference) — CVE-2021-3449
Disclosure Date: March 25, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
4
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-44487
Disclosure Date: October 10, 2023 (last updated June 28, 2024)
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-45105
Disclosure Date: December 18, 2021 (last updated October 07, 2023)
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-20575
Disclosure Date: May 28, 2021 (last updated November 28, 2024)
IBM Security Verify Access 20.07 allows web pages to be stored locally which can be read by another user on the system. X-Force ID: 199278.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-20576
Disclosure Date: May 28, 2021 (last updated November 28, 2024)
IBM Security Verify Access 20.07 could allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted HTTP GET request that could cause the application to crash.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2014-5209
Disclosure Date: January 08, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
An Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in NTP 4.2.7p25 private (mode 6/7) messages via a GET_RESTRICT control message, which could let a malicious user obtain sensitive information.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10219
Disclosure Date: November 08, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
MWG scanners updated to address CVE-2019-9517
Disclosure Date: September 11, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) earlier than 7.8.2.13 is vulnerable to a remote attacker exploiting CVE-2019-9517, potentially leading to a denial of service. This affects the scanning proxies.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
MWG scanners updated to address CVE-2019-9511
Disclosure Date: September 11, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) earlier than 7.8.2.13 is vulnerable to a remote attacker exploiting CVE-2019-9511, potentially leading to a denial of service. This affects the scanning proxies.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2018-15321
Disclosure Date: October 31, 2018 (last updated November 27, 2024)
When BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.2, or 11.2.1-11.5.6, BIG-IQ Centralized Management 5.0.0-5.4.0 or 4.6.0, BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0, iWorkflow 2.1.0-2.3.0, or Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 is licensed for Appliance Mode, Admin and Resource administrator roles can by-pass BIG-IP Appliance Mode restrictions to overwrite critical system files. Attackers of high privilege level are able to overwrite critical system files which bypasses security controls in place to limit TMSH commands. This is possible with an administrator or resource administrator roles when granted TMSH. Resource administrator roles must have TMSH access in order to perform this attack.
0