Show filters
52 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 52
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Very High
CVE-2021-3156 "Baron Samedit"
Disclosure Date: January 26, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.
13
Attacker Value
Low
CVE-2020-14145
Disclosure Date: June 29, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.
5
Attacker Value
Moderate
OpenSSL TLS Server Crash (NULL pointer dereference) — CVE-2021-3449
Disclosure Date: March 25, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
4
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-3537
Disclosure Date: May 14, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
A vulnerability found in libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11 shows that it did not propagate errors while parsing XML mixed content, causing a NULL dereference. If an untrusted XML document was parsed in recovery mode and post-validated, the flaw could be used to crash the application. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-4974
Disclosure Date: October 16, 2024 (last updated October 16, 2024)
The Freemius SDK, as used by hundreds of WordPress plugin and theme developers, was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery and Information disclosure due to missing capability checks and nonce protection on the _get_debug_log, _get_db_option, and the _set_db_option functions in versions up to, and including 2.4.2. Any WordPress plugin or theme running a version of Freemius less than 2.4.3 is vulnerable.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26462
Disclosure Date: February 29, 2024 (last updated February 26, 2025)
Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.21.2 contains a memory leak vulnerability in /krb5/src/kdc/ndr.c.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-51763
Disclosure Date: December 24, 2023 (last updated February 25, 2025)
csv_builder.rb in ActiveAdmin (aka Active Admin) before 3.2.0 allows CSV injection.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-37920
Disclosure Date: July 25, 2023 (last updated February 25, 2025)
Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi prior to version 2023.07.22 recognizes "e-Tugra" root certificates. e-Tugra's root certificates were subject to an investigation prompted by reporting of security issues in their systems. Certifi 2023.07.22 removes root certificates from "e-Tugra" from the root store.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-24329
Disclosure Date: February 17, 2023 (last updated February 24, 2025)
An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-0361
Disclosure Date: February 15, 2023 (last updated February 24, 2025)
A timing side-channel in the handling of RSA ClientKeyExchange messages was discovered in GnuTLS. This side-channel can be sufficient to recover the key encrypted in the RSA ciphertext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption the attacker would need to send a large amount of specially crafted messages to the vulnerable server. By recovering the secret from the ClientKeyExchange message, the attacker would be able to decrypt the application data exchanged over that connection.
0