Show filters
21,006 Total Results
Displaying 91-100 of 10,000
Refine your search criteria for more targeted results.
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-3537

Disclosure Date: May 14, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
A vulnerability found in libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11 shows that it did not propagate errors while parsing XML mixed content, causing a NULL dereference. If an untrusted XML document was parsed in recovery mode and post-validated, the flaw could be used to crash the application. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Attacker Value
Moderate

CVE-2021-21224

Disclosure Date: April 26, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 90.0.4430.85 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page.
Attacker Value
High

CVE-2021-3493

Disclosure Date: April 15, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivileged overlay mounts, an attacker could use this to gain elevated privileges.
Attacker Value
Very High

CVE-2021-21166

Disclosure Date: March 09, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Data race in audio in Google Chrome prior to 89.0.4389.72 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.
Attacker Value
High

CVE-2020-28949

Disclosure Date: November 19, 2020 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Archive_Tar through 1.4.10 has :// filename sanitization only to address phar attacks, and thus any other stream-wrapper attack (such as file:// to overwrite files) can still succeed.
Attacker Value
Very Low

CVE-2020-9490

Disclosure Date: August 07, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers.
Attacker Value
Moderate

CVE-2020-15900

Disclosure Date: July 28, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
A memory corruption issue was found in Artifex Ghostscript 9.50 and 9.52. Use of a non-standard PostScript operator can allow overriding of file access controls. The 'rsearch' calculation for the 'post' size resulted in a size that was too large, and could underflow to max uint32_t. This was fixed in commit 5d499272b95a6b890a1397e11d20937de000d31b.
Attacker Value
Very Low

CVE-2020-15466

Disclosure Date: July 05, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In Wireshark 3.2.0 to 3.2.4, the GVCP dissector could go into an infinite loop. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-gvcp.c by ensuring that an offset increases in all situations.
Attacker Value
Low

CVE-2020-0543 CROSSTALK

Disclosure Date: June 15, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Incomplete cleanup from specific special register read operations in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Attacker Value
Moderate

CVE-2020-9484 — PersistentManager Java deserialization vulnerability

Disclosure Date: May 20, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.