Show filters
284 Total Results
Displaying 61-70 of 284
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-14437
Disclosure Date: August 29, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
The xiph_SplitHeaders function in modules/demux/xiph.h in VideoLAN VLC media player 3.0.7.1 does not check array bounds properly. As a result, a heap-based buffer over-read can be triggered via a crafted .ogg file.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10086
Disclosure Date: August 20, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9515
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leadin…
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9514
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9513
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9518
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9511
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9517
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-1010301
Disclosure Date: July 15, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
jhead 3.03 is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: gpsinfo.c Line 151 ProcessGpsInfo(). The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
0