Show filters
215 Total Results
Displaying 111-120 of 215
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-13734
Disclosure Date: December 10, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Out of bounds write in SQLite in Google Chrome prior to 79.0.3945.79 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2018-12207
Disclosure Date: November 14, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Improper invalidation for page table updates by a virtual guest operating system for multiple Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service of the host system via local access.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-11135
Disclosure Date: November 14, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
TSX Asynchronous Abort condition on some CPUs utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-16942
Disclosure Date: October 01, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the commons-dbcp (1.4) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.SharedPoolDataSource and org.apache.commons.dbcp.datasources.PerUserPoolDataSource mishandling.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-16943
Disclosure Date: October 01, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind 2.0.0 through 2.9.10. When Default Typing is enabled (either globally or for a specific property) for an externally exposed JSON endpoint and the service has the p6spy (3.8.6) jar in the classpath, and an attacker can find an RMI service endpoint to access, it is possible to make the service execute a malicious payload. This issue exists because of com.p6spy.engine.spy.P6DataSource mishandling.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10746
Disclosure Date: August 23, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
mixin-deep is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in versions before 1.3.2 and version 2.0.0. The function mixin-deep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10086
Disclosure Date: August 20, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9515
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leadin…
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-9514
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated January 15, 2025)
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.
0