Show filters
13 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 13
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-46307
Disclosure Date: December 07, 2023 (last updated December 13, 2023)
An issue was discovered in server.js in etcd-browser 87ae63d75260. By supplying a /../../../ Directory Traversal input to the URL's GET request while connecting to the remote server port specified during setup, an attacker can retrieve local operating system files from the remote system.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2022-34038
Disclosure Date: August 22, 2023 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Etcd v3.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function PageWriter.write in pagewriter.go. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this is not a vulnerability.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-32082
Disclosure Date: May 11, 2023 (last updated October 08, 2023)
etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.26 and 3.5.9, the LeaseTimeToLive API allows access to key names (not value) associated to a lease when `Keys` parameter is true, even a user doesn't have read permission to the keys. The impact is limited to a cluster which enables auth (RBAC). Versions 3.4.26 and 3.5.9 fix this issue. There are no known workarounds.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-28235
Disclosure Date: April 04, 2023 (last updated October 08, 2023)
Authentication vulnerability found in Etcd-io v.3.4.10 allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the debug function.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15136
Disclosure Date: August 06, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In ectd before versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23, gateway TLS authentication is only applied to endpoints detected in DNS SRV records. When starting a gateway, TLS authentication will only be attempted on endpoints identified in DNS SRV records for a given domain, which occurs in the discoverEndpoints function. No authentication is performed against endpoints provided in the --endpoints flag. This has been fixed in versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23 with improved documentation and deprecation of the functionality.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15114
Disclosure Date: August 06, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, the etcd gateway is a simple TCP proxy to allow for basic service discovery and access. However, it is possible to include the gateway address as an endpoint. This results in a denial of service, since the endpoint can become stuck in a loop of requesting itself until there are no more available file descriptors to accept connections on the gateway.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15115
Disclosure Date: August 06, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10 does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users' passwords with little computational effort.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15113
Disclosure Date: August 05, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, certain directory paths are created (etcd data directory and the directory path when provided to automatically generate self-signed certificates for TLS connections with clients) with restricted access permissions (700) by using the os.MkdirAll. This function does not perform any permission checks when a given directory path exists already. A possible workaround is to ensure the directories have the desired permission (700).
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15112
Disclosure Date: August 05, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15106
Disclosure Date: August 05, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.
0