Show filters
5 Total Results
Displaying 1-5 of 5
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2015-2590

Disclosure Date: July 16, 2015 (last updated July 17, 2024)
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45, and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4732.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-10198

Disclosure Date: July 31, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
An authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered in foreman-tasks before 0.15.7. Previously, commit tasks were searched through find_resource, which performed authorization checks. After the change to Foreman, an unauthenticated user can view the details of a task through the web UI or API, if they can discover or guess the UUID of the task.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-0223

Disclosure Date: April 23, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
While investigating bug PROTON-2014, we discovered that under some circumstances Apache Qpid Proton versions 0.9 to 0.27.0 (C library and its language bindings) can connect to a peer anonymously using TLS *even when configured to verify the peer certificate* while used with OpenSSL versions before 1.1.0. This means that an undetected man in the middle attack could be constructed if an attacker can arrange to intercept TLS traffic.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1000632

Disclosure Date: August 20, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
dom4j version prior to version 2.1.1 contains a CWE-91: XML Injection vulnerability in Class: Element. Methods: addElement, addAttribute that can result in an attacker tampering with XML documents through XML injection. This attack appear to be exploitable via an attacker specifying attributes or elements in the XML document. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.1.1 or later.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2015-2808

Disclosure Date: April 01, 2015 (last updated October 05, 2023)
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue.
0