Show filters
90 Total Results
Displaying 71-80 of 90
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1258

Disclosure Date: May 11, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1257

Disclosure Date: May 11, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1270

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1271

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1272

Disclosure Date: April 06, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, provide client-side support for multipart requests. When Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux server application (server A) receives input from a remote client, and then uses that input to make a multipart request to another server (server B), it can be exposed to an attack, where an extra multipart is inserted in the content of the request from server A, causing server B to use the wrong value for a part it expects. This could to lead privilege escalation, for example, if the part content represents a username or user roles.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1000120

Disclosure Date: March 14, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
A buffer overflow exists in curl 7.12.3 to and including curl 7.58.0 in the FTP URL handling that allows an attacker to cause a denial of service or worse.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1000121

Disclosure Date: March 14, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
A NULL pointer dereference exists in curl 7.21.0 to and including curl 7.58.0 in the LDAP code that allows an attacker to cause a denial of service
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1000122

Disclosure Date: March 14, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
A buffer over-read exists in curl 7.20.0 to and including curl 7.58.0 in the RTSP+RTP handling code that allows an attacker to cause a denial of service or information leakage
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2016-8610

Disclosure Date: November 13, 2017 (last updated January 27, 2024)
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2016-5385

Disclosure Date: July 19, 2016 (last updated November 25, 2024)
PHP through 7.0.8 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, as demonstrated by (1) an application that makes a getenv('HTTP_PROXY') call or (2) a CGI configuration of PHP, aka an "httpoxy" issue.