Show filters
94 Total Results
Displaying 71-80 of 94
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-35471
Disclosure Date: December 15, 2020 (last updated November 28, 2024)
Envoy before 1.16.1 mishandles dropped and truncated datagrams, as demonstrated by a segmentation fault for a UDP packet size larger than 1500.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-25017
Disclosure Date: October 01, 2020 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Envoy through 1.15.0 only considers the first value when multiple header values are present for some HTTP headers. Envoy’s setCopy() header map API does not replace all existing occurences of a non-inline header.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-25018
Disclosure Date: October 01, 2020 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Envoy master between 2d69e30 and 3b5acb2 may fail to parse request URL that requires host canonicalization.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-15104
Disclosure Date: July 14, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
In Envoy before versions 1.12.6, 1.13.4, 1.14.4, and 1.15.0 when validating TLS certificates, Envoy would incorrectly allow a wildcard DNS Subject Alternative Name apply to multiple subdomains. For example, with a SAN of *.example.com, Envoy would incorrectly allow nested.subdomain.example.com, when it should only allow subdomain.example.com. This defect applies to both validating a client TLS certificate in mTLS, and validating a server TLS certificate for upstream connections. This vulnerability is only applicable to situations where an untrusted entity can obtain a signed wildcard TLS certificate for a domain of which you only intend to trust a subdomain of. For example, if you intend to trust api.mysubdomain.example.com, and an untrusted actor can obtain a signed TLS certificate for *.example.com or *.com. Configurations are vulnerable if they use verify_subject_alt_name in any Envoy version, or if they use match_subject_alt_names in version 1.14 or later. This issue has been fixe…
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-8663
Disclosure Date: July 01, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Envoy version 1.14.2, 1.13.2, 1.12.4 or earlier may exhaust file descriptors and/or memory when accepting too many connections.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-12604
Disclosure Date: July 01, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Envoy version 1.14.2, 1.13.2, 1.12.4 or earlier is susceptible to increased memory usage in the case where an HTTP/2 client requests a large payload but does not send enough window updates to consume the entire stream and does not reset the stream.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-12605
Disclosure Date: July 01, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Envoy version 1.14.2, 1.13.2, 1.12.4 or earlier may consume excessive amounts of memory when processing HTTP/1.1 headers with long field names or requests with long URLs.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-12603
Disclosure Date: July 01, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Envoy version 1.14.2, 1.13.2, 1.12.4 or earlier may consume excessive amounts of memory when proxying HTTP/2 requests or responses with many small (i.e. 1 byte) data frames.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-11767
Disclosure Date: April 15, 2020 (last updated November 27, 2024)
Istio through 1.5.1 and Envoy through 1.14.1 have a data-leak issue. If there is a TCP connection (negotiated with SNI over HTTPS) to *.example.com, a request for a domain concurrently configured explicitly (e.g., abc.example.com) is sent to the server(s) listening behind *.example.com. The outcome should instead be 421 Misdirected Request. Imagine a shared caching forward proxy re-using an HTTP/2 connection for a large subnet with many users. If a victim is interacting with abc.example.com, and a server (for abc.example.com) recycles the TCP connection to the forward proxy, the victim's browser may suddenly start sending sensitive data to a *.example.com server. This occurs because the forward proxy between the victim and the origin server reuses connections (which obeys the specification), but neither Istio nor Envoy corrects this by sending a 421 error. Similarly, this behavior voids the security model browsers have put in place between domains.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-8660
Disclosure Date: March 04, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 TLS inspector bypass. TLS inspector could have been bypassed (not recognized as a TLS client) by a client using only TLS 1.3. Because TLS extensions (SNI, ALPN) were not inspected, those connections might have been matched to a wrong filter chain, possibly bypassing some security restrictions in the process.
0