Show filters
818 Total Results
Displaying 651-660 of 818
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-0349
Disclosure Date: August 14, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
SAP Kernel (ABAP Debugger), versions KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, KERNEL 7.21, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.75, 7.76, 7.77, allows a user to execute “Go to statement” without possessing the authorization S_DEVELOP DEBUG 02, resulting in Missing Authorization Check
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-14809
Disclosure Date: August 13, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
net/url in Go before 1.11.13 and 1.12.x before 1.12.8 mishandles malformed hosts in URLs, leading to an authorization bypass in some applications. This is related to a Host field with a suffix appearing in neither Hostname() nor Port(), and is related to a non-numeric port number. For example, an attacker can compose a crafted javascript:// URL that results in a hostname of google.com.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-11250
Disclosure Date: August 12, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
The Kubernetes client-go library logs request headers at verbosity levels of 7 or higher. This can disclose credentials to unauthorized users via logs or command output. Kubernetes components (such as kube-apiserver) prior to v1.16.0, which make use of basic or bearer token authentication, and run at high verbosity levels, are affected.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-14255
Disclosure Date: August 08, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in go-camo up to version 1.1.4 allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP requests to internal endpoints.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-14544
Disclosure Date: August 02, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
routes/api/v1/api.go in Gogs 0.11.86 lacks permission checks for routes: deploy keys, collaborators, and hooks.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-2308
Disclosure Date: July 25, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
User application could potentially make RPC call to the fastrpc driver and the driver will allow the message to go through to the remote subsystem in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in MDM9150, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, QCS405, QCS605, Qualcomm 215, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 665, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 855, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, SDX20, SDX24
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-2238
Disclosure Date: July 25, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
Lack of check of data type can lead to subsequent loop-expression potentially go negative and the condition will still evaluate to true leading to buffer underflow. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MDM9655, QCS605, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 8CX, SXR1130
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-1010261
Disclosure Date: July 18, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
Gitea 1.7.0 and earlier is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: Attacker is able to have victim execute arbitrary JS in browser. The component is: go-get URL generation - PR to fix: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/5905. The attack vector is: victim must open a specifically crafted URL. The fixed version is: 1.7.1 and later.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-13453
Disclosure Date: July 17, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
Zipios before 0.1.7 does not properly handle certain malformed zip archives and can go into an infinite loop, causing a denial of service. This is related to zipheadio.h:readUint32() and zipfile.cpp:Zipfile::Zipfile().
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-11841
Disclosure Date: May 22, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
A message-forgery issue was discovered in crypto/openpgp/clearsign/clearsign.go in supplementary Go cryptography libraries 2019-03-25. According to the OpenPGP Message Format specification in RFC 4880 chapter 7, a cleartext signed message can contain one or more optional "Hash" Armor Headers. The "Hash" Armor Header specifies the message digest algorithm(s) used for the signature. However, the Go clearsign package ignores the value of this header, which allows an attacker to spoof it. Consequently, an attacker can lead a victim to believe the signature was generated using a different message digest algorithm than what was actually used. Moreover, since the library skips Armor Header parsing in general, an attacker can not only embed arbitrary Armor Headers, but also prepend arbitrary text to cleartext messages without invalidating the signatures.
0