Show filters
2,510 Total Results
Displaying 51-60 of 2,510
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-44487
Disclosure Date: October 10, 2023 (last updated June 28, 2024)
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-27522
Disclosure Date: March 07, 2023 (last updated February 14, 2025)
HTTP Response Smuggling vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server via mod_proxy_uwsgi. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.30 through 2.4.55.
Special characters in the origin response header can truncate/split the response forwarded to the client.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2023-24997
Disclosure Date: February 01, 2023 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.1.0 through 1.5.0. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's latest version or cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7223 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7223 to solve it.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-44790
Disclosure Date: December 20, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-4104
Disclosure Date: December 14, 2021 (last updated October 07, 2023)
JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-40690
Disclosure Date: September 19, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
All versions of Apache Santuario - XML Security for Java prior to 2.2.3 and 2.1.7 are vulnerable to an issue where the "secureValidation" property is not passed correctly when creating a KeyInfo from a KeyInfoReference element. This allows an attacker to abuse an XPath Transform to extract any local .xml files in a RetrievalMethod element.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-34798
Disclosure Date: September 16, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2021-26691
Disclosure Date: June 10, 2021 (last updated November 08, 2023)
In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 a specially crafted SessionHeader sent by an origin server could cause a heap overflow
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-13955
Disclosure Date: October 09, 2020 (last updated February 22, 2025)
HttpUtils#getURLConnection method disables explicitly hostname verification for HTTPS connections making clients vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. Calcite uses internally this method to connect with Druid and Splunk so information leakage may happen when using the respective Calcite adapters. The method itself is in a utility class so people may use it to create vulnerable HTTPS connections for other applications. From Apache Calcite 1.26 onwards, the hostname verification will be performed using the default JVM truststore.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10092
Disclosure Date: September 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed.
1