Show filters
75 Total Results
Displaying 51-60 of 75
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-17569
Disclosure Date: February 24, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-9318
Disclosure Date: February 20, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Red Gate SQL Monitor 9.0.13 through 9.2.14 allows an administrative user to perform a SQL injection attack by configuring the SNMP alert settings in the UI. This is fixed in 9.2.15.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-5397
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-1551
Disclosure Date: December 06, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-10219
Disclosure Date: November 08, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-5482
Disclosure Date: September 16, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Heap buffer overflow in the TFTP protocol handler in cURL 7.19.4 to 7.65.3.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-5481
Disclosure Date: September 16, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Double-free vulnerability in the FTP-kerberos code in cURL 7.52.0 to 7.65.3.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CF CLI writes the client id and secret to config file
Disclosure Date: August 05, 2019 (last updated November 27, 2024)
CF CLI version prior to v6.45.0 (bosh release version 1.16.0) writes the client id and secret to its config file when the user authenticates with --client-credentials flag. A local authenticated malicious user with access to the CF CLI config file can act as that client, who is the owner of the leaked credentials.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-17563
Disclosure Date: March 28, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
When using FORM authentication with Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.29, 8.5.0 to 8.5.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.98 there was a narrow window where an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The window was considered too narrow for an exploit to be practical but, erring on the side of caution, this issue has been treated as a security vulnerability.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-1559
Disclosure Date: February 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
0