Show filters
61 Total Results
Displaying 21-30 of 61
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2019-1559

Disclosure Date: February 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-15756

Disclosure Date: October 18, 2018 (last updated November 08, 2023)
Spring Framework, version 5.1, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.10, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.20, and older unsupported versions on the 4.2.x branch provide support for range requests when serving static resources through the ResourceHttpRequestHandler, or starting in 5.0 when an annotated controller returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. A malicious user (or attacker) can add a range header with a high number of ranges, or with wide ranges that overlap, or both, for a denial of service attack. This vulnerability affects applications that depend on either spring-webmvc or spring-webflux. Such applications must also have a registration for serving static resources (e.g. JS, CSS, images, and others), or have an annotated controller that returns an org.springframework.core.io.Resource. Spring Boot applications that depend on spring-boot-starter-web or spring-boot-starter-webflux are ready to serve static resources out of the box and are therefore vulnerable.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2018-1257

Disclosure Date: May 11, 2018 (last updated November 26, 2024)
Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2016-8610

Disclosure Date: November 13, 2017 (last updated January 27, 2024)
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2016-2518

Disclosure Date: January 30, 2017 (last updated November 25, 2024)
The MATCH_ASSOC function in NTP before version 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.92 allows remote attackers to cause an out-of-bounds reference via an addpeer request with a large hmode value.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2014-0657

Disclosure Date: January 08, 2014 (last updated October 05, 2023)
The administration portal in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 9.1(1) and earlier does not properly handle role restrictions, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass role-based access control via multiple visits to a forbidden portal URL, aka Bug ID CSCuj83540.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2013-6978

Disclosure Date: December 21, 2013 (last updated October 05, 2023)
The disaster recovery system (DRS) component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) 9.1(1) and earlier allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive device information by reading "extraneous information" in HTML source code, aka Bug ID CSCuj39249.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2013-6689

Disclosure Date: November 18, 2013 (last updated October 05, 2023)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 9.1(1) and earlier allows local users to bypass file permissions, and read, modify, or create arbitrary files, via an "overload" of the command-line utility, aka Bug ID CSCui58229.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2013-6688

Disclosure Date: November 18, 2013 (last updated October 05, 2023)
Directory traversal vulnerability in the license-upload interface in the Enterprise License Manager (ELM) component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager 9.1(1) and earlier allows remote authenticated users to create arbitrary files via a crafted path, aka Bug ID CSCui58222.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2013-3453

Disclosure Date: August 22, 2013 (last updated October 05, 2023)
Memory leak in Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence Service before 8.6(5)SU1 and 9.x before 9.1(2), and Cisco Unified Presence, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) by making many TCP connections to port (1) 5060 or (2) 5061, aka Bug ID CSCud84959.
0