Show filters
5 Total Results
Displaying 1-5 of 5
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26157
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2025 (last updated January 18, 2025)
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0
are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in get
view method under view parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic
pages that get their input from the client side and reflect the input in
their response to the client.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26156
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2025 (last updated January 18, 2025)
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0
are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in the
method parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that gets
their input from the client side and reflects the input in its response
to the client.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26155
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2025 (last updated January 18, 2025)
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0
expose clear text credentials in the web portal. An attacker can access
the ETIC RAS web portal and view the HTML code, which is configured to
be hidden, thus allowing a connection to the ETIC RAS ssh server, which
could enable an attacker to perform actions on the device.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26154
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2025 (last updated January 18, 2025)
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0
are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting in the appliance site
name. The ETIC RAS web server saves the site name and then presents it
to the administrators in a few different pages.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2024-26153
Disclosure Date: January 17, 2025 (last updated January 18, 2025)
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.9.19
are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). An external
attacker with no access to the device can force the end user into
submitting a "setconf" method request, not requiring any CSRF token,
which can lead into denial of service on the device.
0