Show filters
8 Total Results
Displaying 1-8 of 8
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2013-4342
Disclosure Date: October 10, 2013 (last updated October 05, 2023)
xinetd does not enforce the user and group configuration directives for TCPMUX services, which causes these services to be run as root and makes it easier for remote attackers to gain privileges by leveraging another vulnerability in a service.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2012-0862
Disclosure Date: June 04, 2012 (last updated October 04, 2023)
builtins.c in Xinetd before 2.3.15 does not check the service type when the tcpmux-server service is enabled, which exposes all enabled services and allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a request to tcpmux port 1.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2003-0211
Disclosure Date: May 05, 2003 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Memory leak in xinetd 2.3.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of rejected connections.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2002-0871
Disclosure Date: September 05, 2002 (last updated February 22, 2025)
xinetd 2.3.4 leaks file descriptors for the signal pipe to services that are launched by xinetd, which could allow those services to cause a denial of service via the pipe.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2001-0825
Disclosure Date: December 06, 2001 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Buffer overflow in internal string handling routines of xinetd before 2.1.8.8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a length argument of zero or less, which disables the length check.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2001-1389
Disclosure Date: August 29, 2001 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Multiple vulnerabilities in xinetd 2.3.0 and earlier, and additional variants until 2.3.3, may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code, primarily via buffer overflows or improper NULL termination.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2001-1322
Disclosure Date: July 10, 2001 (last updated February 22, 2025)
xinetd 2.1.8 and earlier runs with a default umask of 0, which could allow local users to read or modify files that are created by an application that runs under xinetd but does not set its own safe umask.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2000-0536
Disclosure Date: June 04, 2000 (last updated February 22, 2025)
xinetd 2.1.8.x does not properly restrict connections if hostnames are used for access control and the connecting host does not have a reverse DNS entry.
0