Show filters
12 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 12
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2021-24867

Disclosure Date: February 21, 2022 (last updated October 07, 2023)
Numerous Plugins and Themes from the AccessPress Themes (aka Access Keys) vendor are backdoored due to their website being compromised. Only plugins and themes downloaded via the vendor website are affected, and those hosted on wordpress.org are not. However, all of them were updated or removed to avoid any confusion
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2006-0368

Disclosure Date: January 22, 2006 (last updated October 04, 2023)
Cisco CallManager 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR1, 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2c, and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR2 allow remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a large number of open TCP connections to port 2000 and (2) cause a denial of service (fill the Windows Service Manager communication queue) via a large number of TCP connections to port 2001, 2002, or 7727.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2006-0367

Disclosure Date: January 22, 2006 (last updated October 04, 2023)
Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco CallManager 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5)SR1, 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2c, and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR2 allows remote authenticated users with read-only administrative privileges to obtain full administrative privileges via a "crafted URL on the CCMAdmin web page."
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2005-2243

Disclosure Date: July 12, 2005 (last updated October 04, 2023)
Memory leak in inetinfo.exe in Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1, when Multi Level Admin (MLA) is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of Admin Service Tool (AST) logins that fail.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2005-2241

Disclosure Date: July 12, 2005 (last updated October 04, 2023)
Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 does not quickly time out Realtime Information Server Data Collection (RISDC) sockets, which results in a "resource leak" that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and connection consumption) in RisDC.exe.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2005-2244

Disclosure Date: July 12, 2005 (last updated October 04, 2023)
The aupair service (aupair.exe) in Cisco CallManager (CCM) 3.2 and earlier, 3.3 before 3.3(5), 4.0 before 4.0(2a)SR2b, and 4.1 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or corrupt memory via crafted packets that trigger a memory allocation failure and lead to a buffer overflow.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2005-0356

Disclosure Date: May 31, 2005 (last updated October 04, 2023)
Multiple TCP implementations with Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers (PAWS) with the timestamps option enabled allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection loss) via a spoofed packet with a large timer value, which causes the host to discard later packets because they appear to be too old.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2004-0112

Disclosure Date: November 23, 2004 (last updated February 16, 2024)
The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2004-0079

Disclosure Date: November 23, 2004 (last updated December 29, 2023)
The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference.
Attacker Value
Unknown

CVE-2004-0081

Disclosure Date: November 23, 2004 (last updated October 04, 2023)
OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool.
0