Show filters
158 Total Results
Displaying 51-60 of 158
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-18860
Disclosure Date: March 20, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
Squid before 4.9, when certain web browsers are used, mishandles HTML in the host (aka hostname) parameter to cachemgr.cgi.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-12528
Disclosure Date: February 04, 2020 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. It allows a crafted FTP server to trigger disclosure of sensitive information from heap memory, such as information associated with other users' sessions or non-Squid processes.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-8517
Disclosure Date: February 04, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect input validation, the NTLM authentication credentials parser in ext_lm_group_acl may write to memory outside the credentials buffer. On systems with memory access protections, this can result in the helper process being terminated unexpectedly. This leads to the Squid process also terminating and a denial of service for all clients using the proxy.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-8450
Disclosure Date: February 04, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect buffer management, a remote client can cause a buffer overflow in a Squid instance acting as a reverse proxy.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-8449
Disclosure Date: February 04, 2020 (last updated February 21, 2025)
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.10. Due to incorrect input validation, it can interpret crafted HTTP requests in unexpected ways to access server resources prohibited by earlier security filters.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-18678
Disclosure Date: November 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid 3.x and 4.x through 4.8. It allows attackers to smuggle HTTP requests through frontend software to a Squid instance that splits the HTTP Request pipeline differently. The resulting Response messages corrupt caches (between a client and Squid) with attacker-controlled content at arbitrary URLs. Effects are isolated to software between the attacker client and Squid. There are no effects on Squid itself, nor on any upstream servers. The issue is related to a request header containing whitespace between a header name and a colon.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-18679
Disclosure Date: November 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x through 4.8. Due to incorrect data management, it is vulnerable to information disclosure when processing HTTP Digest Authentication. Nonce tokens contain the raw byte value of a pointer that sits within heap memory allocation. This information reduces ASLR protections and may aid attackers isolating memory areas to target for remote code execution attacks.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-12523
Disclosure Date: November 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.9. When handling a URN request, a corresponding HTTP request is made. This HTTP request doesn't go through the access checks that incoming HTTP requests go through. This causes all access checks to be bypassed and allows access to restricted HTTP servers, e.g., an attacker can connect to HTTP servers that only listen on localhost.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-18676
Disclosure Date: November 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid 3.x and 4.x through 4.8. Due to incorrect input validation, there is a heap-based buffer overflow that can result in Denial of Service to all clients using the proxy. Severity is high due to this vulnerability occurring before normal security checks; any remote client that can reach the proxy port can trivially perform the attack via a crafted URI scheme.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2019-18677
Disclosure Date: November 26, 2019 (last updated November 08, 2023)
An issue was discovered in Squid 3.x and 4.x through 4.8 when the append_domain setting is used (because the appended characters do not properly interact with hostname length restrictions). Due to incorrect message processing, it can inappropriately redirect traffic to origins it should not be delivered to.
0