Show filters
61 Total Results
Displaying 51-60 of 61
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-4717
Disclosure Date: December 31, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 on Windows NT 4.0 SP6a, Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP SP1, Windows XP SP2, and Windows Server 2003 SP1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (client crash) via a certain combination of a malformed HTML file and a CSS file that triggers a null dereference, probably related to rendering of a DIV element that contains a malformed IMG tag, as demonstrated by IEcrash.htm and IEcrash.rar.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-2123
Disclosure Date: November 29, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Multiple integer overflows in the Graphics Rendering Engine (GDI32.DLL) in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 and SP2, and Server 2003 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Windows Metafile (WMF) and Enhanced Metafile (EMF) format images that lead to heap-based buffer overflows, as demonstrated using MRBP16::bCheckRecord.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-2124
Disclosure Date: November 29, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Unspecified vulnerability in the Graphics Rendering Engine (GDI32.DLL) in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 and SP2, and Server 2003 SP1, related to "An unchecked buffer" and possibly buffer overflows, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Windows Metafile (WMF) format image, aka "Windows Metafile Vulnerability."
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1985
Disclosure Date: October 13, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The Client Service for NetWare (CSNW) on Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 and Sp2, and Server 2003 SP1 and earlier, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code due to an "unchecked buffer" when processing certain crafted network messages.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1987
Disclosure Date: October 13, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Buffer overflow in Collaboration Data Objects (CDO), as used in Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Exchange Server, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code when CDOSYS or CDOEX processes an e-mail message with a large header name, as demonstrated using the "Content-Type" string.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1978
Disclosure Date: October 12, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
COM+ in Microsoft Windows does not properly "create and use memory structures," which allows local users or remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1979
Disclosure Date: October 12, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Distributed Transaction Controller in Microsoft Windows allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (MSDTC service exception and exit) via an "unexpected protocol command during the reconnection request," which is not properly handled by the Transaction Internet Protocol (TIP) functionality.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1980
Disclosure Date: October 12, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Distributed Transaction Controller in Microsoft Windows allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (MSDTC service hang) via a crafted Transaction Internet Protocol (TIP) message that causes DTC to repeatedly connect to a target IP and port number after an error occurs, aka the "Distributed TIP Vulnerability."
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-2119
Disclosure Date: October 12, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The MIDL_user_allocate function in the Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC) proxy (MSDTCPRX.DLL) allocates a 4K page of memory regardless of the required size, which allows attackers to overwrite arbitrary memory locations using an incorrect size value that is provided to the NdrAllocate function, which writes management data to memory outside of the allocated buffer.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-2765
Disclosure Date: September 01, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
The user interface in the Windows Firewall does not properly display certain malformed entries in the Windows Registry, which makes it easier for attackers with administrator privileges to hide activities if the administrator only uses the Windows Firewall interface to monitor exceptions. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that since administrative privileges are already required, it is not a vulnerability. CVE has not yet formally decided if such "information hiding" issues should be included.
0