A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Schneider Electric's Modicon M340, Modicon Premium, Modicon Quantum PLC, BMXNOR0200. The buffer overflow vulnerability is caused by the length of the source string specified (instead of the buffer size) as the number of bytes to be copied.

A vulnerability exists in the web services to process SOAP requests in Schneider Electric's Modicon M340, Modicon Premium, Modicon Quantum PLC, BMXNOR0200 which could allow result in a buffer overflow.

Vulnerable hash algorithms exists in Schneider Electric's Modicon Premium, Modicon Quantum, Modicon M340, and BMXNOR0200 controllers in all versions of the communication modules. The algorithm used to encrypt the password is vulnerable to hash collision attacks.

A Resource Exhaustion issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Modicon M340 PLC BMXNOC0401, BMXNOE0100, BMXNOE0110, BMXNOE0110H, BMXNOR0200H, BMXP341000, BMXP342000, BMXP3420102, BMXP3420102CL, BMXP342020, BMXP342020H, BMXP342030, BMXP3420302, BMXP3420302H, and BMXP342030H. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted set of packets to the PLC causing it to freeze, requiring the operator to physically press the reset button on the PLC in order to recover.

Stack-based buffer overflow in the GoAhead Web Server on Schneider Electric Modicon M340 PLC BMXNOx and BMXPx devices allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long password in HTTP Basic Authentication data.

Directory traversal vulnerability in SchneiderWEB on Schneider Electric Modicon PLC Ethernet modules 140CPU65x Exec before 5.5, 140NOC78x Exec before 1.62, 140NOE77x Exec before 6.2, BMXNOC0401 before 2.05, BMXNOE0100 before 2.9, BMXNOE0110x Exec before 6.0, TSXETC101 Exec before 2.04, TSXETY4103x Exec before 5.7, TSXETY5103x Exec before 5.9, TSXP57x ETYPort Exec before 5.7, and TSXP57x Ethernet Copro Exec before 5.5 allows remote attackers to visit arbitrary resources via a crafted HTTP request.

The Schneider Electric M340 PLC modules allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors. NOTE: the vendor reportedly disputes this issue because it "could not be duplicated" and "an attacker could not remotely exploit this observed behavior to deny PLC control functions.