Show filters
21 Total Results
Displaying 11-20 of 21
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-4819
Disclosure Date: December 31, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lotus Domino versions before 6.5.4 fix pack 1 (FP1) and versions before 7.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown vectors.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-2428
Disclosure Date: August 03, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail, with "Generate HTML for all fields" enabled, stores sensitive data from names.nsf in hidden form fields, which allows remote attackers to read the HTML source to obtain sensitive information such as (1) the password hash in the HTTPPassword field, (2) the password change date in the HTTPPasswordChangeDate field, (3) the client platform in the ClntPltfrm field, (4) the client machine name in the ClntMachine field, and (5) the client Lotus Domino release in the ClntBld field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2696.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1441
Disclosure Date: May 03, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Format string vulnerability in Lotus Domino 6.0.x before 6.0.5 and 6.5.x before 6.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via the Notes protocol (NRPC).
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-1101
Disclosure Date: May 02, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Multiple buffer overflows in Lotus Domino Server 6.0.5 and 6.5.4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via large amounts of data in certain (1) time or (2) date fields.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2005-0986
Disclosure Date: May 02, 2005 (last updated February 22, 2025)
NLSCCSTR.DLL in the web service in IBM Lotus Domino Server 6.5.1, 6.0.3, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (deep recursion and nHTTP.exe process crash) via a long GET request containing UNICODE decimal value 430 characters, which causes the stack to be exhausted. NOTE: IBM has reported that it is unable to replicate this issue.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2004-1621
Disclosure Date: October 18, 2004 (last updated February 22, 2025)
NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the vendor. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes R6 and Domino R6, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script or HTML via square brackets at the beginning and end of (1) computed for display, (2) computed when composed, or (3) computed text element fields. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this issue, saying that it is not a problem with Notes/Domino itself, but with the applications that do not properly handle this feature
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2004-0029
Disclosure Date: January 20, 2004 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Lotus Notes Domino 6.0.2 on Linux installs the notes.ini configuration file with world-writable permissions, which allows local users to modify the Notes configuration and gain privileges.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2003-0180
Disclosure Date: April 02, 2003 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Lotus Domino Web Server (nhttp.exe) before 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an incomplete POST request, as demonstrated using the h_PageUI form.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2003-0178
Disclosure Date: April 02, 2003 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Multiple buffer overflows in Lotus Domino Web Server before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via (1) the s_ViewName option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, (2) the Foldername option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, or (3) a long Host header, which is inserted into a long Location header and used during a redirect operation.
0
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2003-0181
Disclosure Date: April 02, 2003 (last updated February 22, 2025)
Lotus Domino Web Server (nhttp.exe) before 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a "Fictionary Value Field POST request" as demonstrated using the s_Validation form with a long, unknown parameter name.
0