Show filters
1,185 Total Results
Displaying 1-10 of 1,185
Sort by:
Attacker Value
Very High
CVE-2024-24919
Disclosure Date: May 28, 2024 (last updated February 26, 2025)
Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the internet and enabled with remote Access VPN or Mobile Access Software Blades. A Security fix that mitigates this vulnerability is available.
6
Attacker Value
Moderate
OpenSSL TLS Server Crash (NULL pointer dereference) — CVE-2021-3449
Disclosure Date: March 25, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
4
Attacker Value
Low
CVE-2024-31497
Disclosure Date: April 15, 2024 (last updated February 26, 2025)
In PuTTY 0.68 through 0.80 before 0.81, biased ECDSA nonce generation allows an attacker to recover a user's NIST P-521 secret key via a quick attack in approximately 60 signatures. This is especially important in a scenario where an adversary is able to read messages signed by PuTTY or Pageant. The required set of signed messages may be publicly readable because they are stored in a public Git service that supports use of SSH for commit signing, and the signatures were made by Pageant through an agent-forwarding mechanism. In other words, an adversary may already have enough signature information to compromise a victim's private key, even if there is no further use of vulnerable PuTTY versions. After a key compromise, an adversary may be able to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. A second, independent scenario is that the adversary is an operator of an SSH server to which the victim authenticates (for remote login or file copy), even though this server is not…
2
Attacker Value
Very High
CVE-2014-6271
Disclosure Date: September 24, 2014 (last updated July 25, 2024)
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix.
2
Attacker Value
Moderate
CVE-2022-0482
Disclosure Date: March 09, 2022 (last updated February 23, 2025)
Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor in GitHub repository alextselegidis/easyappointments prior to 1.4.3.
1
Attacker Value
Very High
CVE-2021-41676
Disclosure Date: October 29, 2021 (last updated February 23, 2025)
An SQL Injection vulnerabilty exists in the oretnom23 Pharmacy Point of Sale System 1.0 in the login function in actions.php.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-27266
Disclosure Date: January 19, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, a client-side control vulnerability in the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows physically proximate attackers to bypass user authentication checks via Bluetooth Low Energy.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-27269
Disclosure Date: January 19, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay communication sequences via Bluetooth Low Energy.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-27258
Disclosure Date: January 19, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, an information disclosure vulnerability in the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows unauthenticated attackers to extract the pump’s keypad lock PIN via Bluetooth Low Energy.
1
Attacker Value
Unknown
CVE-2020-27264
Disclosure Date: January 19, 2021 (last updated February 22, 2025)
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications use deterministic keys, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to brute-force the keys via Bluetooth Low Energy.
1